Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Natl Med J India ; 35(3): 162-164, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2156082

RESUMEN

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) infection not only affects the respiratory system but also induces coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis. We report a middle-aged woman who presented during the Covid-19 pandemic with sudden-onset acute left upper limb ischaemia of short duration, with no history of dry cough, breathlessness or fever, and tested positive on TrueNAT for SARS-CoV-2. Later, she developed deep venous thrombosis of the right lower limb during isolation in the hospital.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trombosis de la Vena , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Pierna
2.
Indian J Anaesth ; 66(9): 644-650, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2119846

RESUMEN

Background and Aims: A major limitation to providing oxygen therapy by high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) delivery devices is its availability and therefore as an alternative many clinicians use a standard non rebreathing face mask (NRBM) in order to oxygenate their patients where low-flow nasal oxygen or simple facemask oxygen is not providing adequate respiratory support to achieve the target peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2). We aimed to determine the clinical effectiveness of HFNO versus NRBM in terms of improving patient outcome among patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) during coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Methods: In this prospective open labelled study, 122 COVID-19 patients presenting with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) were randomised to receive either HFNO or NRBM to achieve the target SpO2. The primary clinical outcome measured was device failure rate and secondary outcome was all-cause 28-day mortality rate. Results: The device failure rate was significantly higher in HFNO group (39% versus 21%, P = 0.030). Oxygen support with NRBM resulted in a reduced all mortality rate over HFNO (26.2% versus 45%) but the mortality rate after treatment failure in either group (HFNO or NRBM) remained high (91% versus 92%). Conclusion: Oxygen support with NRBM results in both reduced device failure rate and higher survival among patients of COVID-19 with AHRF.

3.
Indian J Anaesth ; 65(6): 434-438, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1289151
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA